Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.068
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261704, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34972125

ABSTRACT

This pilot project investigated environmental SARS-CoV-2 presence in seven Midwestern meatpacking plants from May 2020 to January 2021. This study investigated social distancing and infection control practices and incorporated environmental sampling of surfaces and air in employee common areas. All plants increased their social distancing efforts, increased the frequency of cleaning and disinfecting worker areas, and screened for symptomatic people to prevent entry into the workplace. 575 samples from common areas were collected and evaluated with RT-qPCR for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. 42/367 surface samples were positive, while no virus was detected in air samples. Case positive data from the counties surrounding each plant showed peak positive SARS-CoV-2 cases from 12-55 days before the virus was detected in the plant, indicating that environmental sampling is likely a lagging indicator of community and plant infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Meat-Packing Industry/statistics & numerical data , Disinfection/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Midwestern United States/epidemiology , Physical Distancing , Pilot Projects
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(4): e184-e186, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33769403

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.


Subject(s)
Anosmia/diagnosis , COVID-19/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Workplace , Acetic Acid , Anosmia/physiopathology , COVID-19/physiopathology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Meat-Packing Industry , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Water
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(4): 1032-1038, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33591249

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has severely impacted the meat processing industry in the United States. We sought to detail demographics and outcomes of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections among workers in Nebraska meat processing facilities and determine the effects of initiating universal mask policies and installing physical barriers at 13 meat processing facilities. During April 1-July 31, 2020, COVID-19 was diagnosed in 5,002 Nebraska meat processing workers (attack rate 19%). After initiating both universal masking and physical barrier interventions, 8/13 facilities showed a statistically significant reduction in COVID-19 incidence in <10 days. Characteristics and incidence of confirmed cases aligned with many nationwide trends becoming apparent during this pandemic: specifically, high attack rates among meat processing industry workers, disproportionately high risk of adverse outcomes among ethnic and racial minority groups and men, and effectiveness of using multiple prevention and control interventions to reduce disease transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Food-Processing Industry , Infection Control , Meat-Packing Industry , Adult , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/transmission , Female , Food-Processing Industry/methods , Food-Processing Industry/organization & administration , Food-Processing Industry/trends , Humans , Incidence , Infection Control/instrumentation , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Male , Meat-Packing Industry/methods , Meat-Packing Industry/organization & administration , Meat-Packing Industry/trends , Minority Health/statistics & numerical data , Nebraska/epidemiology , Occupational Health/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Personal Protective Equipment/standards , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Workplace/standards
4.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 94(5): 799-812, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427996

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is limited information on cold-related pain (CRP) in various parts of the body among workers employed in cold environments. We, therefore, determined the prevalence of CRP among Thai chicken industry workers and attempted to identify vulnerable subgroups. METHODS: Four hundred and twenty-two workers in four chicken meat factories in Thailand were asked about CRP in the face, upper limbs, and lower body. The results were expressed as adjusted prevalence and prevalence differences [PD; in percentage points (pp)] and their 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Overall, 80% of the subjects suffered from CRP in at least one site on the body: 66% in the upper limbs, 65% in the lower body, and 44% in the face. In most sites, CRP increased from the lowest to the highest educational level, notably in the nose with a PD of 36 pp [95% CI 23, 49]. Forklift drivers experienced knee pain [PD 21 pp (0, 41)], and manufacturing [PD 27 pp (15, 38)] and storage workers [PD 24 pp (10, 37)] experienced thigh pain more often than office workers, while office workers reported CRP in the cheeks, ears, wrists, and fingers more often than other workers. Women had more CRP than men in several body sites. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of workers suffered from CRP. Intensified protective measures should be targeted not only for forklift drivers and storage and manufacturing workers, but also for the highly educated as well as the office staff who showed excessive prevalence of CRP in several body sites.


Subject(s)
Cold Temperature/adverse effects , Meat-Packing Industry , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Pain/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Chickens , Face , Female , Humans , Leg , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Thailand/epidemiology , Upper Extremity , Young Adult
5.
Meat Sci ; 171: 108289, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32889306

ABSTRACT

Chemical Lean (CL) is defined as the amount of lean red meat compared to the amount of fat in a meat product. CL determination is a mandatory, AUS-MEAT Ltd. prescribed requirement for any bulk packed meat product destined for export. Fifteen methods are approved by AUS-MEAT Ltd., for use in Australian industry. Engagement with Australian meat processors indicated that a range of methods were used for CL measurements in industry, ranging from wet chemical to instrumental based techniques. Meat (consisting of beef, lamb and pork) was used in a method comparison which included Soxhlet fat extraction and microwave moisture analysis, along with instrumental techniques; near infrared reflectance and transmittance, nuclear magnetic resonance and X-Ray. The methods were compared using Passing-Bablok regression, Bland-Altman plot analysis, and robust z-scores, indicating that overall showed that each method performed satisfactorily, suitable for CL determination in the Australian meat industry.


Subject(s)
Dietary Fats/analysis , Meat-Packing Industry/methods , Red Meat/analysis , Animals , Australia , Cattle , Meat-Packing Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproducibility of Results , Sheep , Swine
6.
Am J Ind Med ; 64(2): 84-96, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284493

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Meatpacking is dangerous, dirty, and demanding (3-D) work-much of which is done by immigrant workers. It is characterized by high rates of occupational injuries and illnesses due to the speed of the production line, repetitive motions, and other inherent exposures. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore perceptions of safety culture among Hispanic/Latino meatpacking workers in the Midwest. METHODS: Five focus groups with a total of 28 participants were conducted between March 2019 and February 2020 with Hispanic/Latino meatpacking workers in Nebraska. Workers were asked about the type of work performed, how the work was physically done, and perceptions of health risks and exposures. Thematic analysis was used to build a description of safety culture within the meatpacking industry. RESULTS: Three main themes were found: (1) workers depicted a culture where companies cared more about production than people; (2) workers felt powerless in improving their situation; and (3) workers noted that the work was precarious, both dangerous and one where much of the responsibility for safety was shifted to the individual workers. CONCLUSIONS: The meatpacking industry has a poor safety culture. Safety culture within the industry may be improved by ensuring that organizational values and artifacts are aligned with safety by addressing the critical role of supervisors, providing culturally and linguistically appropriate consistent safety training and messaging to the workforce, and enforcing and strengthening safety regulations.


Subject(s)
Emigrants and Immigrants/psychology , Hispanic or Latino/psychology , Meat-Packing Industry , Safety Management , Workplace/psychology , Adult , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nebraska , Occupational Exposure , Qualitative Research , Work/psychology , Young Adult
7.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33352725

ABSTRACT

Brazil is the leader in poultry meat exports, in which most products are in the form of cuts. This study analyzed the exertion perception of poultry slaughterhouses workers when performing cutting tasks, as well as the influence of knife sharpness on the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders by Occupational Repetitive Action (OCRA) method. Participants (n = 101) from three slaughterhouses were asked to rate their perceived exertion on the Borg scale during the cutting task when the knife was well and poorly sharpened. The OCRA results showed that the score for cutting with a dull knife was greater (43.57 ± 13.51) than with a sharp knife (23.79 ± 3.10) (p < 0.001). Consequently, there was a significant increase in the risk level of acquiring upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders (UL-WMSD) by using a "poorly sharpened" knife (29%; p < 0.001; Borg scale 2-8). Thus, maintaining well-sharpened knives for optimal performance of the cutting task (fewer technical actions) is suggested, as well as including knife sharpening in the standard operating procedure to reduce musculoskeletal disorders.


Subject(s)
Abattoirs , Meat-Packing Industry , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Physical Exertion , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Brazil/epidemiology , Ergonomics , Humans , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Perception , Poultry , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33140701

ABSTRACT

Occupational Applications This paper provides a historical overview of the rise of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs) in the U.S. from the 1980s to the present, with a special focus on the two industries with the highest recorded rates: Meatpacking and Auto Assembly. The activities underlying this account amount to a major occupational health success story (although still incomplete) in the recognition of these disorders and the development of a nation-wide effort for prevention. An obstacle in creating the data presented here was that the system of recordkeeping changed in multiple ways, making it difficult to compare WMSD rates over time. The work summarized here evaluated the effect of these changes and combined temporal segments that were judged to be the most accurate to create an overall trend line. These results can aid in: 1) showing the overall history of the recognition and prevention of WMSDs, 2) understanding the effects of the recordkeeping changes, and 3) allowing international comparisons of the trends.


Subject(s)
Automation/methods , Ergonomics , Meat-Packing Industry , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases , Occupational Health , Ergonomics/instrumentation , Ergonomics/methods , Humans , Industrial Development/trends , Meat-Packing Industry/methods , Meat-Packing Industry/organization & administration , Meat-Packing Industry/trends , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Occupational Health/trends , Risk Factors , Sustainable Development , United States
9.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 17108, 2020 10 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33051473

ABSTRACT

Processing of animal carcasses and other animal wastes in rendering plants is a significant source of antibiotic resistant microorganisms. The main goal of this study was to investigate the resistance to 18 antibacterial agents including ß-lactams, fluoroquinolones, colistin and virulence factors (iss, tsh, cvaC, iutA, papC, kps and ibeA genes) in 88 Escherichia coli strains isolated from a rendering plant over 1 year period. ESBL (Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases) and plasmid-mediated Amp were screened by interpretative reading of MIC. ESBL phenotype was detected in 20.4% of samples and high level of resistance to fluoroquinolone was found in 27.2% of strains. Cephalosporinase CTX-M1, cephamycinase CMY-2, integrase 1 and transposon 3 genes were detected by PCR. Furthermore, there were found three CMY-2 producing E. coli with O25b-ST131, resistant to the high level of enrofloxacin and containing the gene encoding the ferric aerobactin receptor (iutA). One enrofloxacin resistant E. coli strain possessed iss, ibeA, kps and papC virulence genes also with CMY-2, integrase1 and Tn3. ST131 E. coli with CMY-2 has a zoonotic potential and presents a serious health risk to humans.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Meat-Packing Industry , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Escherichia coli/genetics , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Escherichia coli/pathogenicity , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Virulence/genetics , Virulence Factors/genetics , beta-Lactam Resistance
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32933381

ABSTRACT

OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS The 1990 publication of the Ergonomics Program Management Guidelines for Meatpacking Plants by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) was a milestone in the history of occupational ergonomics and the prevention of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WMSDs). This paper provides an overview of the development of these guidelines based on personal experience and perception, with special emphasis of the central role the industry trade association, the American Meat Institute (AMI). Industry-wide efforts were successful in reducing the extremely high rates of WMSDs in the U.S. meatpacking industry. Described here are the specific steps the AMI undertook, which serve as a model for other groups on ways to address shared problems. Insights are also offered on why these OSHA guidelines were accepted by industry and succeeded, while other equivalent standards did not - including to some extent the de facto application of concepts of cognitive ergonomics to government documents. This report addresses specific events in the U.S., but the implications are broader and have potential widespread relevance.


Subject(s)
Ergonomics , Guidelines as Topic , Meat-Packing Industry , Musculoskeletal Diseases , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Ergonomics/methods , Ergonomics/standards , Humans , Meat-Packing Industry/methods , Meat-Packing Industry/organization & administration , Meat-Packing Industry/standards , Meat-Packing Industry/trends , Musculoskeletal Diseases/etiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Health/standards , Occupational Health/trends , Sustainable Development , United States
11.
J Agromedicine ; 25(4): 378-382, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32945241

ABSTRACT

From the farms to the packing plants, essential workers in critical food production industries keep food on our tables while risking their and their families' health and well-being to bring home a paycheck. They work in essential industries but are often invisible. The disparities illuminated by COVID-19 are not new. Instead, they are the result of years of inequities built into practices, policies, and systems that reinforce societal power structures. As a society, we are now at an antagonizing moment where we can change our collective trajectory to focus forward and promote equity and justice for workers in agriculture and food-related industries. To that end, we describe our experience and approach in addressing COVID-19 outbreaks in meat processing facilities, which included three pillars of action based on public health ethics and international human rights: (1) worksite prevention and control, (2) community-based prevention and control, and (3) treatment. Our approach can be translated to promote the health, safety, and well-being of the broader agricultural workforce.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Farmers/psychology , Meat-Packing Industry/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Health , Animals , COVID-19/epidemiology , Farmers/statistics & numerical data , Food Supply , Human Rights , Humans , Public Health/statistics & numerical data
12.
Elife ; 92020 09 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876563

ABSTRACT

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) are two highly infectious and lethal viruses causing major economic losses to pig production. Here, we report generation of double-gene-knockout (DKO) pigs harboring edited knockout alleles for known receptor proteins CD163 and pAPN and show that DKO pigs are completely resistant to genotype 2 PRRSV and TGEV. We found no differences in meat-production or reproductive-performance traits between wild-type and DKO pigs, but detected increased iron in DKO muscle. Additional infection challenge experiments showed that DKO pigs exhibited decreased susceptibility to porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), thus offering unprecedented in vivo evidence of pAPN as one of PDCoV receptors. Beyond showing that multiple gene edits can be combined in a livestock animal to achieve simultaneous resistance to two major viruses, our study introduces a valuable model for investigating infection mechanisms of porcine pathogenic viruses that exploit pAPN or CD163 for entry.


Pig epidemics are the biggest threat to the pork industry. In 2019 alone, hundreds of billions of dollars worldwide were lost due to various pig diseases, many of them caused by viruses. The porcine reproductive and respiratory virus (PRRS virus for short), for instance, leads to reproductive disorders such as stillbirths and premature labor. Two coronaviruses ­ the transmissible gastroenteritis virus (or TGEV) and the porcine delta coronavirus ­ cause deadly diarrhea and could potentially cross over into humans. Unfortunately, there are still no safe and effective methods to prevent or control these pig illnesses, but growing disease-resistant pigs could reduce both financial and animal losses. Traditionally, breeding pigs to have a particular trait is a slow process that can take many years. But with gene editing technology, it is possible to change or remove specific genes in a single generation of animals. When viruses infect a host, they use certain proteins on the surface of the host's cells to find their inside: the PRRS virus relies a protein called CD163, and TGEV uses pAPN. Xu, Zhou, Mu et al. used gene editing technology to delete the genes that encode the CD163 and pAPN proteins in pigs. When the animals were infected with PRRS virus or TGEV, the non-edited pigs got sick but the gene-edited animals remained healthy. Unexpectedly, pigs without CD163 and pAPN also coped better with porcine delta coronavirus infections, suggesting that CD163 and pAPN may also help this coronavirus infect cells. Finally, the gene-edited pigs reproduced and produced meat as well as the control pigs. These experiments show that gene editing can be a powerful technology for producing animals with desirable traits. The gene-edited pigs also provide new knowledge about how porcine viruses infect pigs, and may offer a starting point to breed disease-resistant animals on a larger scale.


Subject(s)
CD13 Antigens/deficiency , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Coronavirus/pathogenicity , Gastroenteritis, Transmissible, of Swine/prevention & control , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/pathogenicity , Receptors, Cell Surface/deficiency , Transmissible gastroenteritis virus/pathogenicity , Animals , Animals, Genetically Modified , Antigens, CD/genetics , Antigens, CD/immunology , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/genetics , Antigens, Differentiation, Myelomonocytic/immunology , Body Composition , CD13 Antigens/genetics , CD13 Antigens/immunology , Coronavirus/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/immunology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Disease Susceptibility , Gastroenteritis, Transmissible, of Swine/genetics , Gastroenteritis, Transmissible, of Swine/immunology , Gastroenteritis, Transmissible, of Swine/virology , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Host Microbial Interactions , Meat-Packing Industry , Phenotype , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/genetics , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/immunology , Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome/virology , Porcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virus/immunology , Receptors, Cell Surface/genetics , Receptors, Cell Surface/immunology , Sus scrofa/genetics , Swine , Transmissible gastroenteritis virus/immunology , Weight Gain
13.
Tex Med ; 116(8): 30-31, 2020 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866272

ABSTRACT

IN TEXAS, COVID-19 outbreaks have been especially pronounced in three types of facilities: nursing homes, jails or prisons, and meatpacking plants. The Amarillo area has plenty of all three. But it was the meatpacking plants that drew national attention to Amarillo's COVID-19 problems. The city, which straddles Potter and Randall counties, has numerous plants that employ 12,000 to 15,000 people. In early April, Amarillo's two hospitals began filling up with COVID-19 patients who worked at a plant in neighboring Moore County. Two weeks later, workers from a plant in Potter County flooded in.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Food Packaging , Infection Control , Meat Products/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Food Packaging/methods , Food Packaging/standards , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Meat-Packing Industry/organization & administration , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Texas/epidemiology
14.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(31): 1015-1019, 2020 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32759914

ABSTRACT

On March 24, 2020, the South Dakota Department of Health (SDDOH) was notified of a case of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in an employee at a meat processing facility (facility A) and initiated an investigation to isolate the employee and identify and quarantine contacts. On April 2, when 19 cases had been confirmed among facility A employees, enhanced testing for SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was implemented, so that any employee with a COVID-19-compatible sign or symptom (e.g., fever, cough, or shortness of breath) could receive a test from a local health care facility. By April 11, 369 COVID-19 cases had been confirmed among facility A employees; on April 12, facility A began a phased closure* and did not reopen during the period of investigation (March 16-April 25, 2020). At the request of SDDOH, a CDC team arrived on April 15 to assist with the investigation. During March 16-April 25, a total of 929 (25.6%) laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were diagnosed among 3,635 facility A employees. At the outbreak's peak, an average of 67 cases per day occurred. An additional 210 (8.7%) cases were identified among 2,403 contacts of employees with diagnosed COVID-19. Overall, 48 COVID-19 patients were hospitalized, including 39 employees and nine contacts. Two employees died; no contacts died. Attack rates were highest among department-groups where employees tended to work in proximity (i.e., <6 feet [2 meters]) to one another on the production line. Cases among employees and their contacts declined to approximately 10 per day within 7 days of facility closure. SARS-CoV-2 can spread rapidly in meat processing facilities because of the close proximity of workstations and prolonged contact between employees (1,2). Facilities can reduce this risk by implementing a robust mitigation program, including engineering and administrative controls, consistent with published guidelines (1).


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Meat-Packing Industry , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , South Dakota/epidemiology , Young Adult
16.
Agri ; 32(3): 120-127, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32789824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Musculoskeletal disorders are the most common work-related health problems. The risk of musculoskeletal disorders is increased by working in a cold environment. The present study aims to investigate the effects of working years on the body. METHODS: We examined the effects of the working years on the musculoskeletal system and carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms of the individuals who were engaged in cutting, shredding, packaging, bagging and transportation operations at 9 degrees and lower ambient temperatures in a poultry factory in Turkey. Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) was used to evaluate musculoskeletal symptoms of the individuals. Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ) was used to investigate the carpal tunnel symptoms. Individuals grouped according to their total working years in a cold factory setting. Groups were formed as less than two years, between two and five years, between six and nine years, and ten years or more. RESULTS: This study showed that the increase in working years in a cold factory setting might lead to a feeling of pain and discomfort in various regions of the body, disrupt ordinary works due to the pain felt (p<0.05). This study also showed that the severity of the symptoms felt because carpal tunnel syndrome worsened, especially when an individual has been working for more than ten years in cold. CONCLUSION: Working in the cold for a long time may result in long-term health effects on the human body.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/epidemiology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Animals , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/etiology , Cold Temperature , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Meat-Packing Industry , Middle Aged , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Pain Measurement , Poultry , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Turkey/epidemiology , Workload , Young Adult
17.
S D Med ; 73(7): 312-317, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805781

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aim to describe the basic demographics, clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with Covid-19 admitted to Avera McKennan Hospital and University Health Center Intensive Care Unit (ICU) between March 20 and May 4, 2020. METHODS: In this single centered, retrospective, observational study, we enrolled 37 critically ill adults with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to the (ICU) between March 20 and May 4, 2020. Demographic data, admitting symptoms, laboratory values, co-morbidities, treatments and clinical outcomes were collected. Data was compared between survivors and non-survivors. We aim to describe our data and report the 28-day mortality as of June 1, 2020. RESULTS: Of 154 patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia during our study period, 37 (24 percent) were critically ill and required an ICU stay. The mean age was 58 years and 76 percent were men. Of these 37 patients, 28 (78 percent) had a chronic illness (diabetes in 43 percent, hypertension in 47 percent). In addition, 54 percent were associated with a local meat packing plant. Most common presenting symptoms were dyspnea (92 percent), cough (70 percent) and fever (68 percent). The mean PaO2/ FiO2 ratio was 143 (67-362). Significant lab findings include the following: 54 percent of patients had lymphocytopenia, the mean ferritin was 850 ng/mL (10-3528), the mean D-Dimer was 4.09 FEU ug/mL and the mean IL-6 was 96.5 pg/mL. At 28 days, 24 percent (nine) had died. Twenty-five (68 percent) patients required mechanical ventilation, with 10 (27 percent) of those patients requiring initiation of neuromuscular blocking agents for ventilator compliance. Of those four (40 percent) did not survive. In addition, 20 patients (54 percent) were proned. Pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax occurred in five of the 37 (14 percent). Renal replacement therapy was required in 6 of the 37 patients, 4 of whom (66 percent) died. Steroids were used in 70 percent of patients, tocilizumab in 59 percent, and hydroxychloroquine in 27 percent. All patients received antibiotics. Convalescent plasma became available for our 5th patient. A total of 29 (78 percent) received convalescent plasma, (86 percent of survivors and 56 percent non-survivors). Median ICU length of stay was 11 days for both survivors (1-49) and non-survivors (1-21). There were no differences in age, body mass index (BMI), or initial PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) among those two groups. Non-survivors (nine) included the two immune compromised patients in our cohort, two patients with pre-existing DNR/DNI status, and one death within two hours of admit. Compared with survivors, more of the non-survivors received vasopressors (78 percent vs 46 percent), dialysis (44 percent vs 7 percent) and hydroxychloroquine (44 percent vs 21 percent). The first 5 patients treated in the ICU did not survive. One month after the initial case was reported in South Dakota, our ICU experienced a six-week surge. At its highest, COVID-19-related census reached 63 percent of the ICU capacity (15/24). CONCLUSION: Mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19 is high. Multi-organ, advanced and prolonged critical care resources are needed. Interpretation of our data is limited by a higher mortality of the earlier members of the cohort, a change in therapeutic practice over time and institution of social distancing.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Critical Illness , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Meat-Packing Industry , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , South Dakota/epidemiology
19.
Goiânia; SES-GO; 2. rev; 12 jul 2020. 1-22 p.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | Coleciona SUS, SES-GO, CONASS | ID: biblio-1116580

ABSTRACT

Com o objetivo de estabelecer medidas de proteção para a contenção e disseminação do COVID-19 na liberação da retomada das atividades econômicas no Estado de Goiás - Brasil, estabelece protocolos para o retorno à operação de academias, quadras poliesportivas, treinamento esportivo profissional, instituições religiosas, shopping centers, shopping centers, restaurantes e similares, indústrias de abate e processamento de carnes, hotéis e similares, transporte público local, intermunicipal e interestadual, serviços de call center e call centers, salões de beleza e afins, para atividades esportivas quadras, piscinas e quadras em condomínios residenciais


In order to establish protective measures for the containment and dissemination of COVID-19 in the liberation of the resumption of economic activities in the State of Goiás - Brazil, it establishes protocols for returning to the operation of gyms, sports courts, professional sports training, religious institutions, shopping centers , Shopping centers, restaurants and the like, slaughtering and meat processing industries, hotels and the like, local, intercity and interstate public transportation, call center services and call centers, beauty salons and the like, for activities in sports courts, swimming pools and blocks in residential condominiums


Subject(s)
Humans , Security Measures , Sports , Brazil/epidemiology , Pandemics , Restaurants , Swimming Pools , Meat Industry , Hotel Sanitation , Fitness Centers , Dairying , Beauty and Aesthetics Centers , Call Centers , Meat-Packing Industry
20.
Int J Mol Sci ; 21(11)2020 May 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32486214

ABSTRACT

Hydrophobic membrane contactors represent a promising solution to the problem of recycling ammoniacal nitrogen (N-NH4) molecules from waste, water or wastewater resources. The process has been shown to work best with wastewater streams that present high N-NH4 concentrations, low buffering capacities and low total suspended solids. The removal of N-NH4 from rendering condensate, produced during heat treatment of waste animal tissue, was assessed in this research using a hydrophobic membrane contactor. This study investigates how the molecular composition of rendering condensate wastewater undergo changes in its chemistry in order to achieve suitability to be treated using hydrophobic membranes and form a suitable product. The main objective was to test the ammonia stripping technology using two types of hydrophobic membrane materials, polypropylene (PP) and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) at pilot scale and carry out: (i) Process modification for NH3 molecule removal and (ii) product characterization from the process. The results demonstrate that PP membranes are not compatible with the condensate waste as it caused wetting. The PTFE membranes showed potential and had a longer lifetime than the PP membranes and removed up to 64% of NH3 molecules from the condensate waste. The product formed contained a 30% concentrated ammonium sulphate salt which has a potential application as a fertilizer. This is the first demonstration of hydrophobic membrane contactors for treatment of condensate wastewater.


Subject(s)
Ammonia/isolation & purification , Meat-Packing Industry/instrumentation , Water Pollutants, Chemical/isolation & purification , Water Purification/methods , Ammonium Compounds , Buffers , Equipment Design , Fertilizers , Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Membranes, Artificial , Nitrogen/chemistry , Pilot Projects , Polypropylenes/chemistry , Polytetrafluoroethylene/chemistry , Surface Properties , Waste Disposal, Fluid/methods , Wastewater/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...